【吳展良】中西最高學理的綰合與沖突:嚴復「道通為一」一包養app說析論

requestId:68499ab1442978.50492369.

The integration and conflict between the highest theories of Chinese and Western countries: a serious analysis of “Daotong is the same”

Author: Wu Zhanliang (Taiwan History Department)

Source: AuthorBaobao.comAuthor: Confucian Network Published

          Original from “Taiwan Literature, History and Philosophy” Issue 54 (2001, Taipei)

Time: Confucius was in the 2568th year of Dingyou July 29th, Jiyou

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 The rigorous thinking of “Taotong is one” is deeply inspired by the knowledge system of Oriental science and systemization, as well as the “philosophical temperament” and “one-body communication” contained in Oriental Art System. He realized that logic and sensibility are the most basic of all Eastern academics, and proposed the saying that sensibility is the common source of the principles of the world. Advocate for science but is deeply influenced by the two Chinese Taoist and Confucian scholars, and aims to melt concepts such as “Tao”, Taiyang, Logos, “rationality”, and natural law into one to complete the illusion of “construction and peace”. The most basic difficulty lies in the principles believed in the oriental sensibility, which are generally broad concepts that transcend time and space, and are inconsistent with the concept of “Tao” that integrates time and space reasons. The academic foundation of traditional style that leads to peace is also different from the academic foundation of Eastern countries. However, on the one hand, he has accepted the concept of Enlightenment-style general theory, and on the other hand, he has been deeply blessed by Tianyan’s teaching, experience and learning Nafa logic. The verbal meaning he understands is more important than the verbal meaning. The basic principle goes beyond the general principles of time and space, so it is combined with the reasons of time, change and space, and the Taoist system of “One can be easy, big can be transformed” is integrated into the Taoist system of “one can be easy, big can be transformed”; it will definitely dissolve the nature, and it will not go against the Chinese people’s emphasis on the Taoist tradition of general and time and space, common and special. Sensitive theory andThrough the experience of the theory, the general principles and time and space reasons, the tradition of Chinese Taoism and Oriental theory, science, philosophy, Confucianism and Taoism coexist in strict thinking, and the intercourse form an image with profound connotation, richness and hiding contradiction. When he was young, he focused on general principles and later on the traditional Chinese theories that were adapted to time and time. This is the foundational direction of this thinking, which is worth paying attention to.

 

【Keywords】

 

 

Tao, theory, sensory theory, experience theory, practical theory, logic, enlightenment, wiseism, broad righteousness, time, emptiness, “Yi”, evolutionary theory, speech, science, philosophy, Confucianism, Taoism

 

I have been concentrating on communicating the highest academic and academic fantasies of China and the West. This concept is based on his statement that “Tao is connected to one”. [1] For strictness, “Taotong is one” is not only the ultimate goal of academic activities, but also the highest creation of academic thinking. The serious “Daotong is one” said that the academic community has not yet studied it in depth. [2] This article will analyze the important ideological connotation and academic goals displayed in the strict “Taotong is One”, and point out the integration and conflict between the highest theory of Chinese and Western science and academic fantasy shown here.

 

1. The ultimate goal of academic research

 

Seriously, “Taotong is one” is the main and ultimate goal of human academic research. He said:

 

In order to study things, the Tao must be one, and then it includes group words. Therefore, although the branches and leaves are smooth and the schools are full of confusion, and follow the rules and regulations, there is no one who does not fall in love with one thing. [3]

 

The active academic research must be based on the branches and at the most basic level, so that it is “learned to one”, so that it contains various misleading facts. As for discussing the truth and not being able to reach the state of “the Tao is connected to one”, it is a serious retribution: Smith’s words are rented, and he does not particularly ignore what he calls the Tao is connected to one; and he often makes examples, and after several periods, or after the previous period, he does not know it. …No one can understand it, and it is impossible to learn from one sect if it is said to others. That is, there are famous sayings in the world, and the meaning of the word is not enough to integrate the mind. Later, this article was a family of thought, and I thought about the two meanings of refining the rules and finding the best. [4]

 

I believe that scholars must seek the ultimate truth of the matter based on the object they are studying, so that they can understand the principles and “learn in one school.” This kind of path-seeking is one, which is a process of “following the rules” and “learning into one”. Students should first study some other principles, and then “from branches to branches, follow branches to trunks, learn from thousands of schools, and gather from one source.” At this point, “the big way is seen.” This process is what is called “reasoning and enlightenment”:

 

The matters of reasoning and enlightenment are all words that are consistent with, and there is no special reference.However, the more connected the knowledge and the more respected the examples are. The truth is like a woody tree, from the branches to the branches, following the branches to the trunk, and transcending all schools and gathering from one source; as for one source, the big way can be seen. The way of Tao is one, which is what it means. …The word “联有” is a general rule. If you want to be a public law, you should first earn the public name, and then you should have a public name and then have a public law to entrust it. …The academic research of studying things has progressed. All of this will be effective, and the one who is said to be specialized in the public. [5]

 

From the process of becoming a specialist, you can obtain many “public rules” and “reasons”, and you will eventually realize that various “public rules” and “reasons” will eventually become one. href=”http://www.taiwanblog.net/Eric/%e5%96%ae%e8%ba%ab%e5%be%8b%e5%b8%ab%e4%b9%8b%e5%8c%85%e9%a4%8a%e6%97%a5%e8%a8%98-1-%e7%94%b7%e4%ba%ba%e6%89%80%e5%b9%bb%e6%83%b3%e7%9a%84%e8%81%b7%e6%a5%ad/”>Caring Network“. When he commented on Lao Tzu’s sentence “The same mysterious, mysterious and mysterious, and wonderful door”, he proposed the saying “those who come from Western philosophy do not come from these twelve words”, and also pointed out:

 

The same character is funny, everything is obtained from the same. Xuan, the wonderful door that it calls it, is what the Westerners call Summum Genus. The “Book of Changes” is one, the “Taiyang and “Unsolute” verses, and the same is true for this. Cultivate the market[6]

 

It can be seen that he regards “the Tao as one”, that is, constantly integrating the principles and principles recognized by humans to one, and regarding the highest goal of the cooperation between Chinese and Western learning and thinking. This highest goal also points to people’s understanding of the so-called “Tao”: the “Tao” mentioned by the old man, the “Taiyang” mentioned by the “Book of Changes”, the “Safety” mentioned by the Buddha, the “first cause” mentioned by Western philosophers, and the “Do not pass the Dharma door”, the origin of the transformation and the ruins of learning. [7]

 

At this highest state, human knowledge is finally combined with the most basic of the universe to become one, that is, what it calls “the origin of all transformations and the ruins of learning.”

 

Strictly take “Taotong as one” as the highest goal to cooperate with the Chinese and Western academic institutions. But in his comments, we see modern Eastern academic thinking on the one hand, and at the same time we encounter a large number of major concepts from Chinese traditions. This modern and traditional intercourse shows a severity of integrating Chinese and Western learning into a fantasy, and on the other hand, it also contains a very tight nature. To deeply understand the integration and conflict between the highest Chinese and Western thoughts and fantasies between China and Western Conference, we